Uber may no longer use its app to connect customers with rental car drivers in Germany, according to a court order.
The service UberX violates the passenger transport law, the regional court of Cologne ruled after a Cologne taxi operator had sued the company demanding an injunction be placed on it.
The sticking point in the case is the question of how Uber drivers get their fares: The Passenger Transportation Act stipulates, among other things, that rental car drivers – in contrast to taxis – may only pick up fares “which have been received at the company headquarters or in the home of the entrepreneur.”
Uber had written to its business partners – rental car companies that use the Uber app – that the business must run according to this act.
In its ruling, however, the court complained that a driver is able to accept a fare independent of instructions from the company headquarters. This violates the Passenger Transportation Act, the court decided.
The service UberX plays a central role for the US company. For customers, this service has a similar function to taxi rides. Uber in part also acts as a broker for trips with classic taxis.
The decision was made in July, but has only just been made public due to delays in notification: The injunction and the prohibition only apply after notification has been successfully delivered.
According to a court spokesman, Uber had refused to accept the injunction at its European headquarters in Amsterdam because no translation had been sent for the German document.
Whether a second delivery including a translation has now been made was unclear. A company spokesman did not want to comment.Gossip - Who Which What Where When How #jaiyeorie 📎 ... CRITIC ALSO 🖋️ spill TEA ☕ Easy on Shade 💣 🖋️ 📜 COMMENT BELOW
The service UberX violates the passenger transport law, the regional court of Cologne ruled after a Cologne taxi operator had sued the company demanding an injunction be placed on it.
The sticking point in the case is the question of how Uber drivers get their fares: The Passenger Transportation Act stipulates, among other things, that rental car drivers – in contrast to taxis – may only pick up fares “which have been received at the company headquarters or in the home of the entrepreneur.”
Uber had written to its business partners – rental car companies that use the Uber app – that the business must run according to this act.
In its ruling, however, the court complained that a driver is able to accept a fare independent of instructions from the company headquarters. This violates the Passenger Transportation Act, the court decided.
The service UberX plays a central role for the US company. For customers, this service has a similar function to taxi rides. Uber in part also acts as a broker for trips with classic taxis.
The decision was made in July, but has only just been made public due to delays in notification: The injunction and the prohibition only apply after notification has been successfully delivered.
According to a court spokesman, Uber had refused to accept the injunction at its European headquarters in Amsterdam because no translation had been sent for the German document.
Whether a second delivery including a translation has now been made was unclear. A company spokesman did not want to comment.Gossip - Who Which What Where When How #jaiyeorie 📎 ... CRITIC ALSO 🖋️ spill TEA ☕ Easy on Shade 💣 🖋️ 📜 COMMENT BELOW
0 Comments