About Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us
expr:content='data:blog.isMobile ? "width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0" : "width=1100"' name='viewport'/> Jaiyeorie — What’s happening | Why It Matters : Sofia Vergara ordered to pay her ex-fiancé, Nicholas Loeb, $80,000 amid 'frozen embryo' battle

Sofia Vergara ordered to pay her ex-fiancé, Nicholas Loeb, $80,000 amid 'frozen embryo' battle





Actress,?Sofia Vergara ordered to pay her ex-fianc?, Nicholas Loeb, $80,000 amid


Sofia and Nicholas began dating in 2010 and got engaged two years later, before splitting in 2014. However, before this, the couple looked into using IVF and a surrogate to have a child together.

Before starting IVF, Vergara and Loeb signed an agreement that said one person could not use the cryopreserved material to create a child without the explicit written consent of the other.

Two embryos were created and remain in cryogenic storage at the ART Reproductive Center.
According to court documents, a Los Angeles judge ruled that Vergara owes Loeb $76,433 in attorney's fees and an additional $2,959.26 in legal costs a payment totaling $79,392.26 that is expected to be made within 30 days of the ruling.

The lump sum is 35% than what Loeb sought when he filed a motion in June of this year, asking that his ex pay him $117,590.87 in attorney's fees and $2,958.26 in legal costs.

The legal bill stemmed from Vergara's unsuccessful attempt to sue her ex for malicious prosecution; she had accused him of filing a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation), an outlawed legal strategy of burdening opponents with relentless legal costs until they give up. A judge threw out the case and ordered Vergara to pay Loeb's legal costs; he came back with the $120,000 figure.
 
Vergara's legal team rejected the high cost of the bill, questioning the work done by each member of Loeb's team and their level of knowledge, claiming that, if anything, the bill should be only $24,000.

In its ruling Tuesday, October 22nd the court determined Loeb's billing records were a little high, decreeing that he could not fully justify the $120,000 bill. However, it refused to dismiss his claim entirely or reduce it to one-fifth, as Vergara's team sought, before finally settling on the 35 percent reduction.

Where do you stand on this legal chess match? Is it fair for an ex to demand custody of frozen embryos against one partner's wishes, or should an explicit prior contract over reproductive material be ironclad? Let's talk about it below! 

Gossip - Who Which What Where When How #jaiyeorie 📎 ... CRITIC ALSO 🖋️ spill TEA ☕ Easy on Shade 💣 🖋️ 📜 COMMENT BELOW

No comments: