About Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us
Jaiyeorie — What’s happening, and why it matters.

When an online scammer tired Kate Henshaw



Kate Henshaw has warned social-media users about an apparent scam involving someone using her identity to make fraudulent requests.

The veteran Nollywood actress took to Instagram to alert her followers after discovering that a phone number was allegedly being used to impersonate her.

In the warning, Henshaw identified the number as belonging to a scammer and urged people to block it rather than engage with the person behind it.

The scam relied on Kate Henshaw's identity

The danger with this type of fraud is not necessarily the celebrity herself.

It is the trust attached to her name.

A scammer who impersonates a recognisable public figure can make an otherwise suspicious message appear legitimate. A victim may assume that a request is genuine simply because the person's name, photograph or identity appears familiar.

In Henshaw's case, the warning centred on a number that she said was impersonating her. Social-media posts connected to the warning also urged people to ignore and report accounts or numbers making requests in her name.


For scammers, impersonating a celebrity provides something money cannot easily buy: instant credibility.

The person receiving a message may already know the celebrity and may therefore lower their guard.

The scammer doesn't necessarily need to convince someone that they are famous. They only need the victim to believe that the message is genuinely coming from that famous person.

That is why seemingly simple requests for money, transfers, assistance or personal information can become dangerous when they come through an account or number pretending to belong to someone trusted.

Kate Henshaw has been vocal about online fraud before

This isn't the first time Henshaw has used her social-media platform to speak about online scams and questionable fundraising.

In February 2025, she urged Nigerians to verify medical fundraising claims before sending money after a viral account of a woman seeking cancer treatment raised concerns about whether donations had been genuinely used for the stated purpose. Henshaw advised people to verify medical claims and, where possible, visit the hospital themselves.

That makes her latest warning consistent with a broader message she has previously shared online: don't let emotion replace verification.

The safest response is verification

A familiar name is not proof of identity.

Neither is a profile photograph.

Neither is a WhatsApp display picture.

And increasingly, even a convincing message can be manufactured or copied.

If someone claiming to be a celebrity asks for money, personal information or a financial transfer, the safest approach is to stop and verify the request through an independently confirmed official account.

Do not use the phone number or contact details supplied by the person making the request to verify their identity.

Instead, go directly to the public figure's verified social-media account or official website and check whether the request has actually been made.

The bigger lesson from Kate Henshaw's warning

Celebrity impersonation is ultimately less about fame than it is about trust.

Scammers borrow identities because people are more likely to respond when they believe the person contacting them is familiar, influential or trustworthy.

Henshaw's warning therefore extends beyond her own followers.

It is a reminder that on social media, recognising a name is not the same thing as verifying a person.

And when money enters the conversation, that distinction can be expensive.

Jaiyeorie takeaway: If a celebrity—or anyone else—contacts you unexpectedly asking for money, assistance or sensitive information, verify the identity independently before responding.

Tania Omotayo, Dabota Lawson, Lola Oj and Tomike Adeoye Celebrate as Toke Makinwa’s Daughter Yakira Turns One in London

Toke Makinwa's daughter, Yakira, marked her first birthday surrounded by family, friends and some of Nigeria's familiar fashion and entertainment faces.


Toke Makinwa didn't just throw her daughter a first birthday party—she created a little One-derland for her.
The London celebration was filled with dreamy pink and purple décor, playful details and a whimsical birthday atmosphere, giving Yakira's milestone the fairytale treatment.

Among those who came out to celebrate were Tania Omotayo, Dabota Lawson, Lola Oj and Tomike Adeoye, bringing plenty of personality—and, naturally, plenty of style—to the special occasion.







Toke welcomed Yakira in August 2025 and named her Yakira Eliana, Olakitan, Iyanuoluwa, Ikeoluwa, Adunola. She described her daughter as her “miracle” and said becoming a mother was the happiest she had ever been. 


London was the place to be as Toke Makinwa’s daughter, Yakira Eliana, celebrated her first birthday surrounded by family, friends and some of her mum’s stylish inner circle.

Among those who came out for the special occasion were Tania Omotayo, Dabota Lawson, Lola Oj and Tomike Adeoye, who all joined the birthday festivities.

Tomike even gave followers a little glimpse into the excitement online, announcing that they were off to celebrate “the latest one year old in London” while cheekily referring to Toke as the “assistant birthday girl.” 

And honestly, that description says a lot.

Because while Yakira was obviously the star of the day, first birthdays have a funny way of becoming celebrations of the mother too.

Yakira Is One!

A year ago, Toke introduced her daughter to the world as her long-awaited miracle.

She announced Yakira’s arrival in August 2025, describing motherhood as the happiest experience of her life and saying, “God heard, God answered.” 

Now, that tiny baby is officially one.

And judging from the guest list, Toke wasn't celebrating quietly.

The Girls Came Through

Tania Omotayo.

Dabota Lawson.

Lola Oj.

Tomike Adeoye.

Didi Akinyulire.


It was giving fashion girls, media girls and friends coming together for one very special little girl.

The interesting part is that these aren't random celebrity appearances. They are familiar faces from Toke's wider social circle, making the celebration feel much more personal than a typical celebrity event.

One Year of Yakira

There's something emotional about a child's first birthday.

The baby won't remember the party.

She won't remember who travelled to London, what everyone wore or what the cake looked like.

But one day, she'll look through these photographs and see something much more important:

She was surrounded by people who came to celebrate her.

And perhaps that's the real beauty of a first birthday.

It's not just marking twelve months.

It's documenting the beginning of a life.

For Toke, this is also a completely different chapter from the one she was living a year ago. In November 2025, she described her first birthday as a mother as a moment of “mind-blowing grace,” reflecting on how dramatically her life had changed. 

Now she's celebrating her little girl turning one.

Happy 1st birthday, Yakira! 🥂🎂💕

And Tomike may have called Toke the “assistant birthday girl,” but let's be honest—Mummy definitely had her moment too.

What do you think of Yakira's London birthday celebration?

Dapper Responds to Shallipopi’s Allegations: “I Have Nothing to Hide. The Records Exist”


Music executive Damilola “Dapper” Akinwunmi has responded after former signee Shallipopi accused him of financial misconduct, including alleged unpaid money, contract issues and alleged signature forgery. Shallipopi said he had taken his complaint to the EFCC and called for the matter to be investigated. 

Dapper responded publicly on X, saying that the relevant records exist and are with the authorities. He wrote: “I have nothing to hide. The records exist. The authorities have them. Let the process establish the truth.” 

Shallipopi alleges that his signature was forged for a 10-year distribution agreement and that money received through a deal with Virgin Music Group was allegedly withheld. Dapper has denied the allegations and challenged the artists involved to subject their contracts and financial records to independent audits. 
Dapper has questioned Shallipopi's account of how their contractual relationship developed.


According to Dapper's latest response, Shallipopi had previously described the circumstances of their deal differently. Dapper also maintained that Shallipopi renegotiated his agreement in 2024 with legal representation involved and entered into new terms.
This is significant because the disagreement is no longer simply about whether money changed hands.
It also concerns which contracts existed, what each agreement permitted, how revenue was accounted for and whether the documents being relied upon are authentic.

What is confirmed is that Shallipopi has publicly made the allegations and that Dapper has publicly responded. The accusations themselves have not been established as proven facts in the sources reviewed. Dapper's response indicates that he is relying on documentary and financial records to defend his position. 

 This is bigger than another celebrity fallout. The dispute puts the business relationship between Nigerian artists and music executives under scrutiny, particularly around contracts, royalties, accounting and who controls an artist's commercial rights. Dapper Music previously responded to Shallipopi's 2024 departure by saying it had provided financial records and was cooperating with auditors. 


What has actually been established?
At this point, the public record establishes that:
Shallipopi ended his relationship with Dapper Music and publicly alleged breach of trust and financial-transparency problems.
Dapper Music denied the allegations and defended its contracts and accounting practices.
The label said it was cooperating with auditors engaged by Shallipopi.


Dapper has now publicly insisted that records exist and that the appropriate process should establish the truth.
What has not been established simply by the accusations and responses is that either side's version of the disputed financial matters has been conclusively proven.
Why the dispute matters beyond Shallipopi
The argument touches a much bigger issue in Nigeria's music industry: how clearly artists understand the financial and contractual arrangements behind their careers.

A successful artist can generate income from recordings, publishing, distribution, performances, endorsements and other commercial opportunities. The contracts governing those revenue streams can therefore become extremely important as an artist's career grows.
The Shallipopi-Dapper dispute has placed those usually private business arrangements in the public conversation.
And that may ultimately be the most significant part of the story.
The real question now
The public has already heard two competing narratives.


Shallipopi says there were serious problems with transparency and the terms of his agreements.
Dapper disputes those allegations and says the documentation exists.
So the most useful question is no longer simply “Who is telling the truth?”
It is:
What do the contracts, accounting records and any formal findings actually show?
Until that evidence is publicly established, the allegations should remain allegations — and the denials should remain denials.
The records, as Dapper himself put it, are where the next chapter of this dispute may be decided.

The most important sentence in Dapper's response may actually be the simplest: “The records exist.” In a dispute built around money and contracts, social-media arguments can only take the story so far. The real turning point would be what the underlying agreements, financial records and any official investigation ultimately establish. Until then, the public is watching two competing narratives — and waiting for documentation to speak louder than social media.

When two sides tell completely different stories about money and contracts, should the public wait for the records before choosing a side?





Ademola Adeleke Wins Second Term in Osun as Congratulations Pour In After 66,252-Vote Victory

 Governor Ademola Adeleke has won re-election as Osun State governor, defeating APC candidate Bola Oyebamiji in the 2026 governorship election. Adeleke secured 511,067 votes, while Oyebamiji polled 444,815, giving the incumbent a winning margin of 66,252 votes. INEC formally declared Adeleke the winner at the state collation centre in Osogbo on August 16. 

The result was declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Reports from Premium Times and The Guardian independently confirm the vote totals and margin. 

Adeleke, running on the Accord Party platform, won 19 of Osun's 30 local government areas, while Oyebamiji of the APC won 11. Najeem Salaam of the ADC finished third with 17,180 votes. 


The victory gives Adeleke another four-year term. It is also notable because he won his first term in 2022 under the PDP before defecting to Accord in December 2025. 

This election is bigger than a simple victory headline. Adeleke's return to office shows how political loyalty, incumbency and voter choice can intersect in a closely watched state election. The 66,252-vote margin also gives the result a clear numerical story: this was not a narrow win decided by a handful of ballots, but a sizeable advantage across the state. For Adeleke, the next challenge is therefore no longer winning the election—it is turning the renewed mandate into results voters can see during his second term.

Do you see Adeleke's re-election as a strong endorsement of his performance, or did voters simply choose the candidate they trusted most for Osun's next chapter?


Adeleke

second term

Osun

66,252-vote margin

congratulations





Nollywood Actress, Dakore Egbuson-Akande, Appointed Juror for Global Arts Prize for Innovation

The Global Leaders Institute announced Dakore’s appointment on its official Instagram page, introducing the actress as a member of the Arts Jury for the prestigious global prize. According to the institute, Dakore was selected in recognition of her outstanding contributions to the film industry, her influence in the creative sector and her commitment to social impact through storytelling.








The organisation described her as one of Africa’s most celebrated screen talents whose work continues to inspire audiences across the world. As a juror, Dakore will join an international panel of respected arts and cultural leaders responsible for reviewing entries and selecting recipients of the Global Arts Prize for Innovation. The Global Arts Prize for Innovation recognises artists, creative organisations and cultural initiatives from around the world that use creativity to drive innovation and create positive social impact. 



Winners also receive funding to support and expand their projects. Dakore’s appointment adds to her growing list of international recognitions and further reinforces Nollywood’s presence on the global stage.



 Source: @globalleadersinstitute

“I was born into Nollywood before Nollywood was born.” That is not just a statement — it is a legacy.




 Fred Amata’s The Heartbeat of a Filmmaker is a deeply personal reconstruction of an extraordinary journey spanning over four decades of creative passion, sacrifice, innovation, and cultural impact.



 Born into a family whose roots were already intertwined with the foundations of Nigerian theatre and screen storytelling, Fred Amata did not merely witness the rise of Nollywood — he helped shape its heartbeat long before the industry had a name. Through intimate memories, untold experiences, triumphs, betrayals, artistic struggles, and defining moments in African cinema, the book traces the evolution of a filmmaker whose life became inseparable from the story of Nigerian film itself.


 It is both a memoir and a historical reflection — a journey through the soul of storytelling, the price of vision, and the enduring spirit of a man who dedicated over 40 years to the growth of an industry that would become one of the largest film movements in the world. The Heartbeat of a Filmmaker is not simply the story of a career. It is the story of legacy, resilience, family, culture, and the relentless pursuit of purpose through the lens of African cinema.

“You want to be my friend ke?” — Nkechi Blessing reacts as Diadem’s friendship drama sparks conversation online




“Tinubu! You’re k!lling democracy”- Davido roars as he discloses a plot to withdraw the police and military from the ongoing election in Osun state.👀



“No more magic can be done”- Davido says as he shares live results of the ongoing Osun governorship election, indicating that Accord party is leading.👀




“I can never be jealous of your slice bread house”- Ehi Ogbebor blasts Diiadem as she shares evidence of the villa she booked abroad.👀




Ehi Ogbebor shares her chat with Diiadem from years back begging her to use her as her handbag and to use her house for photoshoots.👀











Adeola Diiadem former friend Berbiedoll lock horns in ugly morning fight

Lagos-based entrepreneurs Adeola and former friend Berbiedoll lock horns in ugly morning fight Lagos-based beauty entrepreneur Adeola Adeyemi (popularly known as Diiadem) and athleisure brand founder Christiana Kayode (Berbiedoll) were once close friends in the influencer and business circles. 




Their friendship reportedly ended around five years ago. In the early hours of Friday, Berbiedoll broke her long silence after her name was dragged into the ongoing public fallout between Diiadem and Dabota Lawson. She accused Diiadem of remaining bitter, stalking her activities through personal shoppers, using staff accounts to send mean messages, and pressuring collaborators (including videographers and photographers) to choose sides. Berbiedoll also claimed Diiadem once fired a team member simply for working with her and described the behaviour as evidence of deep-seated envy and insecurity.

‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenu‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.‘I ate Hilda Baci food one day, I almost died, her boyfriend Dapper is a ripper’: Seyi Vibez drags his former label boss as T.I Blaze Accuses Dapper Music of ₦1.2bn Revenue Discrepancy.

T.I Blaze, in a series of posts, accused Dapper Music of licensing his intellectual property without mutual agreement and questioned the involvement of Virgin Music in the arrangement.

He also alleged that about ₦1.2 billion in revenue remained unexplained, while claiming that he had waited several months for the matter to be resolved amicably. 




Beautiful moment Governor Adeleke prostrated before his older sister, Chief Dr.(Mrs) Modupeola Adeleke Sanni while celebrating his victory.



Dabota Lawson Fires Back at Diiadem: “You Begged Me to Send Money the Day You Announced Your Aso-Ebi for Sale So Men Would Give More”










Beauty entrepreneur and Real Housewives of Lagos star Dabota Lawson has issued a detailed public response to claims made by Adeola Adeyemi (popularly known as Diiadem) regarding a ₦5 million transfer and the collapse of their friendship.

Earlier on Thursday, Diiadem shared bank transfer receipts and stated that Lawson sent her ₦5 million as a birthday gift in January 2026. According to Diiadem, after she publicly acknowledged the transfer, she was told it was a “girls’ game” and was required to return the money, which she did.

Lawson further claimed that Diiadem repeatedly asked her to invite wealthy men to her birthday party — requests she said she declined. She added that she spent well over ₦5 million spraying Diiadem at the party, brought others who also sprayed her, and produced souvenirs for the event. She also alleged that Diiadem had previously borrowed money from her and delayed repayment for months.
Beyond the money issue, Lawson addressed several other points raised in the ongoing fallout. She stated that she processed visas for both Diiadem and Churchill for a Bali trip, encouraged Diiadem to participate in a joint campaign opportunity (BIML), supported her during a difficult personal period, and even guided her through faith-related exam preparations. Lawson also referenced a change in Diiadem’s attitude after she (Lawson) successfully secured funding from a finance company that Diiadem had also approached.

Lawson challenged Diiadem to stop making indirect accusations and to state clearly and publicly what specific offence she claims Lawson committed. She wrote repeatedly: “SAY EXACTLY WHAT DABOTA LAWSON DID TO YOU.”




According to Dabota's version, Diiadem allegedly asked her to send money when she announced her aso-ebi for sale, with the purpose of making it appear that money was already coming in so that men would be encouraged to spend more. Dabota says this was not an isolated request: she claims Diiadem repeatedly asked her to invite wealthy men to her events and help create an image of financial abundance. 

This is particularly interesting because it changes the meaning of the ₦5 million dispute.

Diiadem's presentation was essentially:

Dabota sent me ₦5 million as a birthday gift, called it a birthday gift, and later asked for it back.



Dabota's counter-narrative is essentially:

 You asked me to send the money in the first place—and there was a reason you wanted it publicly visible.



So the two women aren't actually arguing about the same thing.

Diiadem is arguing about what the ₦5 million was.

Dabota is arguing about why the money was sent.

And that distinction is huge.

Dabota also claims she spent more than ₦5 million spraying money at Diiadem's birthday, brought other people who sprayed money and arranged souvenirs for the celebration. 

The deeper tea

This makes the fallout look less like a sudden argument over one birthday gift and more like a long-running dispute over reciprocity, social access, money and image.

Dabota's accusation essentially paints the relationship as one where she was being asked to provide social capital—money, wealthy contacts, visibility and access—while Diiadem's account paints Dabota as someone who later weaponised things she had voluntarily given.

Neither version has been independently proven in full.

But there is one thing the public receipts now make difficult to dispute: money was deeply embedded in this friendship. And once money becomes part of how two people measure what they have done for each other, resentment can accumulate very quietly.

That's why this new accusation is significant.

It moves the conversation from “Why did Dabota ask for her gift back?” to:

Was the ₦5 million actually a gift, or was it part of a mutually understood social arrangement that both women now remember very differently?


i remember being g@nged up on and physically att@cked simply because I was one of the first girls around to start wearing human hair… At the end of the day, I have the grace of God… Sincere apologies to all the names I mention yesterday” - Diiadem in new Snapchat story

i remember being g@nged up on and physically att@cked simply because I was one of the first girls around to start wearing human hair… At the end of the day, I have the grace of God… Sincere apologies to all the names I mention yesterday” - Diiadem in new Snapchat story




Diiadem’s new statement — “I remember being g@nged up and physically att@cked simply because I was one of the first girls around to start wearing human hair…” — is now being circulated alongside her apology to people whose names she mentioned during yesterday’s explosive revelations. A social-media post reproducing the statement confirms the wording and says she issued an apology. 



The current fallout reportedly began with Diiadem accusing Dabota Lawson of using bloggers and smear campaigns when friendships end. Diiadem specifically brought up the Sophia Momodu “boat saga” and said she became concerned after Dabota allegedly admitted to taking the story to blogger Cutie Julls. 

Then Dabota came back with a much broader counterattack.

She alleged that Diiadem was jealous of her success and opportunities and claimed their relationship became strained after Dabota secured a business funding opportunity that Diiadem had also pursued. Dabota also accused Diiadem of asking her to invite wealthy men to parties and create an impression of financial success. 

Then the ₦5 million entered the story.

Diiadem showed a January 12, 2026 Providus Bank receipt showing ₦5 million from Dabota, with the narration “Happy birthday in advance.” Diiadem says she publicly acknowledged the gift, only to subsequently be told that it was “girls game” and had to be returned. She says she refunded it immediately and showed the refund receipt. 

But the money is only one layer.

Dabota claims she had supported Diiadem at different points, including during her pregnancy, and says she had already spent/sprayed substantial money at Diiadem's birthday celebration. Diiadem, meanwhile, says she once borrowed ₦1 million from Dabota and later repaid ₦1.5 million, including extra money for Dabota's daughter. 

Then the argument moved into relationships and social access.

Dabota made allegations involving Diiadem and businessman Olakunle Churchill, including claims about a trip to Bali for which she says she processed visas for both of them. Diiadem disputed Dabota's account and brought up Dabota's alleged interest in connecting people within her social circle. 

Ehi Ogbebor was subsequently dragged into the dispute after Diiadem referenced her in connection with Churchill. Ogbebor reportedly responded in a voice note, denying a romantic relationship with Churchill and accusing Diiadem of dragging her into the conflict. 

And Berbiedoll also entered the conversation, describing Diiadem as a “terrible friend” and making her own allegations about their past friendship. 

So what does today's “human hair” statement suggest?

This is where it gets interesting.

Diiadem appears to be pulling the conversation further back into her personal history. Instead of simply fighting about Dabota, she is reminding people that she has previously experienced hostility from women around her — including, according to her account, being physically attacked over being among the early women wearing human hair.

But there's another important detail: she is now apologising for the names she mentioned yesterday.

That suggests she may have realised that yesterday's revelations went much further than she originally intended, especially because several unrelated people have now been pulled into the dispute.

So I wouldn't interpret the apology as necessarily meaning “everything I said was false.”

It can mean:

“I said too much. I dragged people into something that was originally between me and Dabota. I'm taking responsibility for naming them.”

And that is actually a significant change in tone.

Yesterday was exposure.

Today is containment.

Whether Diiadem's human-hair story is connected to the same pattern of friendship, competition, visibility and perceived jealousy that she believes has followed her throughout her social rise—or whether she is simply recounting an old experience while trying to explain why the current fallout has affected her so deeply.

At this point, those motivations are her perspective, not independently established facts. The current reporting makes clear that both women are presenting competing versions of the friendship's breakdown. 

And honestly, the ₦5 million may have been the smallest part of this fallout. The real fight appears to be about loyalty, access, business opportunities, reputation—and who gets to control the story when the friendship ends.