The King’s College saga started after the Federal Government approved a 35-year concession/PPP arrangement that would give the King’s College Old Boys’ Association (KCOBA) a major role in managing and rehabilitating the Lagos school. The government and KCOBA have stressed that the school is not being sold and that ownership remains with the Federal Government.
The King’s College controversy began after the Federal Ministry of Education, in a letter dated September 4, 2026, directed the immediate handover of King’s College, Lagos, to the King’s College Old Boys’ Association (KCOBA) under a PPP concession. Education Minister Tunji Alausa later clarified that the school had not been sold and that the Federal Government would retain ownership, while KCOBA would finance, rehabilitate, modernise, operate and maintain the 117-year-old institution.
The arrangement triggered opposition from parents, teachers and education-sector unions. On September 14, workers disrupted the resumption of Federal Unity Colleges, and on September 15, staff and parents at King’s College blocked KCOBA representatives from entering the school. Police were subsequently deployed around the premises.
Although Alausa said on September 16 that there was “no going back” on the concession, the Federal Government and labour reached an agreement on September 17 to pause implementation for two weeks and establish a seven-member committee to review the agreement and the concerns raised by workers.
Things became more tense when KCOBA representatives went to the school and were reportedly prevented from entering by protesting workers. Police were called in, and the disagreement escalated into a confrontation. The dispute also affected the wider resumption of Federal Unity Colleges.
KCOBA maintains that the concession is about rescuing and modernising a school whose facilities have deteriorated, not taking ownership of it. Critics, particularly workers and some parents, remain concerned about transferring the management of a public institution to an old boys’ association.
Following the confrontation, the Federal Government agreed to pause implementation for two weeks and set up a seven-member committee to review the concession and the concerns raised by labour.
So, at its core, the King's College saga is a dispute over who should manage a historic public school, who should fund it, and whether a concession is the right way to preserve it.
If government still owns King’s College, but an old boys’ association manages it for 35 years, who really gets to decide the school’s future?
Is bringing in private management a practical way to rescue a struggling public institution — or does it raise bigger questions about the future of public education?
If you were a parent of a King’s College student, would you support the concession or oppose it? And why?












































































