During the interview, Ojy Okpe asked Dangote whether—given the traditional expectations of Kano society—he still hoped to have a male heir to carry on his family name and multi-billion-dollar legacy. Dangote calmly responded that a male heir was not his priority, noting that his three daughters are performing wonderfully and that having a son does not automatically safeguard a legacy.
Ojy Okpe's Question:
"You are almost 70, you are 69 years old at this moment, and you know in Kano's traditional society there is still an expectation of a male heir to carry the family name and legacy forward. Do you still hope to have a son?"
Aliko Dangote's Response:
"That's not really my priority. Let me say it bluntly, it is not really my priority. God controls everything. Sometimes you can pray to have a son, but that son could be the one to drag the family name down. Sometimes when God doesn't give you something, don't push it. I don't think a son would have done something better than these three daughters that I have."
While some social media users defended the question as a reflection of deeply ingrained patriarchal norms in Northern traditional society that needed to be brought to light, a large wave of netizens heavily shaded and criticized Ojy Okpe. Critics accused her of dragging public discourse backward, pushing an outdated feudal mindset, and ignoring the progressive reality of Dangote actively empowering his daughters to lead his global business empire.
Was Ojy Okpe asking a bold, necessary question about traditional African patriarchal pressures, or was it an outdated query that undermined the incredible work Aliko Dangote's daughters are already doing in business?
Drop your thoughts in the comments below!





























